Analyzing a Published Work

Analyzing a Published Work Overview One of the most important moves academic writers can overtake is the art of compend. This assignment will succor you to develop the skills necessary to determine the consequence found within a text. To be clear, the intent of this canvas is non to reason out for or against the content instead, we are analyzing what the hold does in terms of the following 1. think, 2. approach, and 3. efficientness. denomination Go to an online publisher website Chicago Tribune http//www. chicagotribune. com/, http//www. ansascity. com/, or http//www. nytimes. com/ are a few come-at-able sites, but feel free to practice a more(prenominal) local newspaper website. Find an word in the Op/ED section that is railway lineative in nature. employ the following questions to guide your abbreviation 1. What is the purpose of the text? In other words, what on the dot is the dress the obligate takes and/or what does the root want his or her readers to bel ieve and/or do after reading the member? 2. What strategies does the text use to attempt to get hold of its purpose? Give examples from the article.In other words, does the article use facts, examples, experiences, logic, assumptions, data, sources, expert opinion, and so on to prove his or her position? Be sure to give examples. You could also emphasise to determine if the position is presented as more of a Classical argument or a Rogerian argument. 3. What are the strengths and weaknesses of the approach the article used? In other words, what would you get to liked to see more of in the article? Less of? What worked? What didnt work? Do you detect bias that is unreasonable? Does the pen use unreasonable assertions, stereotypes, or haywire training to perk up his or her points?Does the occasion place the opposition in an cheating(prenominal) light? Does the fountain distort the arguments of those who differ? Does the author fail to recognize the weaknesses in his or her own position? Does the author leave out important information? Does the author back up his or her assertions with evidence, or does he or she plain make assumptions? What would most improve the argument? Explain your answers. Remember, we are not contention for or against the content of these articles we are analyzing what the article attempts to do, how it does it, and if it does so fairly.We should not be implicated almost how we feel about the article. To be clear Your readers should not know what your position is about the subject. Your readers should only know whether or not you felt the article was reasonable, well-developed, fair, etcetera Do not embroil individualised opinion or personal judgments about the subject matter. Do not include personal narrative. This summary should be presented in the form of a single essay, established with a title rogue, an introduction, three embody paragraphs (purpose, approach, and arrangeiveness), a conclusion, and a full Refe rences page.Your analytic thinking should meet the following criteria Is based on a on-going topic and/or event is between 300-500 words in length, not including the title page, abstract (if used), and References page includes direct quotations and paraphrased passages from the text uses attributive tags that not only work to convey the caprice of the writer, but establish him or her as an authority in the field of take in avoids personal opinion is written clearly, concisely, and accurately is written solely in third-person is formatted in APA style and includes a References page has been closely edited so that it contains few or no mechanical errors is ordered with a title page, an introduction, three body paragraphs (purpose, approach, and effectiveness), a conclusion, and a full References page. *Note that no one writes a polished essay in a single sitting. outgrowth early and give yourself time for bigeminal revisions. Analysis Checklist As you work on your analytic thin king, it is a good idea to livelihood the following questions in mind 1. How does this analysis meet the assignment criteria? . How close do you feel your analysis reflected the presentation of the accepted argument? 3. Does this analysis use effective transitions as it progresses from paragraph to paragraph? 4. Does this analysis avoid personal opinion, casual language, or first or second person language? 5. Is there anything in this analysis that could have been left out without losing its effect? 6. Is there anything else that could have been added to this analysis to make it feel more complete? 7. Is this analysis based on a current topic?